fwiw
08-18-2008, 11:44 PM
In the below youtube you can watch the "California Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Summit" (Part I) where Gov. Swartzenger, Mike Leavitt, and a very interesting panel of medical professionals and experts from around the state of California discuss their intentions for preparing Calif. for a possible avian-flu pandemic.
During the discussion phase Mike Leavitt states that a general quarantine is not being considered as part of the preparedness preparations advocated by the Federal Govt., because it doesn't work. Instead he said they are opting for limiting the contact people have with one another (sort of a mask-wearing mobility). The obvious exceptions being at seaports and airports.
I was shocked to hear him say this, particularly as he is going around the country meeting with the governors and signing pledges of cooperation between national and local govt. on this issue. IOW the states will follow Leavitt's lead on this.
This stance is also contrary to that put forward by his own Church, as described in the BYU Idaho Pandemic Preparedness webpages and in other places. I am not blaming him for not being able to put forth the agenda of the Church while in his calling as a Federal official...it's just that I think it would have been entirely appropriate for him to have slipped some of his own thoughts and feelings in on the subject while he was at it...but he did not. After all, his job offers him the opportunity to contribute greatly to the planning on this subject.
A final reason for my alarm is because the federal agency, the Department of Homeland Security, has specifically CALLED for the voluntary 3-month self-quarantine of people and families, should a pandemic break out. It seems these two federal branches are at odds with one another in their statements on how individuals and states ought to prepare for this possible future disaster.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=RXtmjTXm2Ng&feature=related
During the discussion phase Mike Leavitt states that a general quarantine is not being considered as part of the preparedness preparations advocated by the Federal Govt., because it doesn't work. Instead he said they are opting for limiting the contact people have with one another (sort of a mask-wearing mobility). The obvious exceptions being at seaports and airports.
I was shocked to hear him say this, particularly as he is going around the country meeting with the governors and signing pledges of cooperation between national and local govt. on this issue. IOW the states will follow Leavitt's lead on this.
This stance is also contrary to that put forward by his own Church, as described in the BYU Idaho Pandemic Preparedness webpages and in other places. I am not blaming him for not being able to put forth the agenda of the Church while in his calling as a Federal official...it's just that I think it would have been entirely appropriate for him to have slipped some of his own thoughts and feelings in on the subject while he was at it...but he did not. After all, his job offers him the opportunity to contribute greatly to the planning on this subject.
A final reason for my alarm is because the federal agency, the Department of Homeland Security, has specifically CALLED for the voluntary 3-month self-quarantine of people and families, should a pandemic break out. It seems these two federal branches are at odds with one another in their statements on how individuals and states ought to prepare for this possible future disaster.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=RXtmjTXm2Ng&feature=related